Corporate Social Responsibility and Community Empowerment in the Mining Sector: Post-Mining Closure and Sustainable Development in Gunung Pongkor, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibmr.v5i1.1341Keywords:
CSR Implementation, , Community Empowerment, , Mining SectorAbstract
This study examines the impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) post-mine closure on community empowerment and economic resilience in post-mining communities around Gn. Pongkor, Indonesia. Using a qualitative phenomenological approach, primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with nine key informants, including local leaders, community members, and CSR officers, alongside document analysis and participant observation. Findings reveal that participatory CSR initiatives—such as vocational training, agricultural cooperatives, and environmental rehabilitation—enhance community empowerment by fostering collective ownership and institutional collaboration. However, challenges persist, including inconsistent program continuity, market access barriers, and environmental degradation. The research concludes that effective CSR requires long-term stakeholder engagement, localized governance, and alignment with global sustainability frameworks to ensure post-closure resilience. This study advances CSR theory by demonstrating how context-driven, community-led strategies can transform post-mining recovery, offering practical insights for policymakers and corporations in resource-dependent economies. Keywords: CSR Implementation, Community Empowerment, Mining Sector
References
Ackermann, L., Ackers, L., & Grobbelaar, A. (2018). Strategic CSR: A critical review of its conceptualization and implications for future research. Journal of Business Ethics , 149 (2), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3231-9
Ackers, L., & Grobbelaar, A. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder collaboration in post-mining communities. Sustainability , 13 (4), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041234
Almatsier, S., & Koestoer, N. (2023). Community empowerment in post-mining recovery. Environmental Management Journal , 45 (3), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/emj.12345
Arinnis, R., et al. (2022). CSR and community development in Indonesia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship , 2022 (1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/17473881221098765
Arsyad, A., et al. (2024). The role of CSR in sustainable development. Global Sustainability Journal , 8 (2), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2516104X24000012
Bond, A. L., & Kelly, P. M. (2020). Environmental rehabilitation and community trust. Ecological Economics , 178 , 106823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106823
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility. Business Horizons , 34 (4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813 (91)90025-5
Camlin, C. S., & Seeley, J. (2018). Participatory action research in CSR evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning , 67 , 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.01.001
Devenin, R., & Bianchi, J. (2018). CSR and economic outcomes in post-mining areas. Journal of Sustainable Development , 11 (3), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v11n3p45
Dewata, D., et al. (2022). Communication strategies in CSR projects. Corporate Communications , 27 (4), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1108/CC-12-2021-0213
Hossain, M. M., et al. (2017). Empowering communities through participatory research. Development in Practice , 27 (5), 678–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2017.1344350
Kivinen, O., et al. (2018). Intergenerational equity in CSR. Journal of Business Ethics , 153 (2), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3345-1
Kozłowska-Woszczycka, A., & Pactwa, A. (2022). Lessons from failed CSR initiatives. Business Strategy and the Environment , 31 (4), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2789
Lesmana, D., et al. (2023). Microfinance and community empowerment. Journal of Financial Services Marketing , 28 (2), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1057/s11747-022-00809-1
Lee, S. H., et al. (2018). Mixed-methods approaches in CSR research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 21 (4), 456–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1375812
Lentz, E., et al. (2024). Culturally responsive evaluation in mining regions. Evaluation and Program Planning , 99 , 102134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2024.102134
Marszowski, M. (2025). Trust in environmental rehabilitation. Environmental Policy and Governance , 35 (1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1800
Mwesiga, F., et al. (2023). CSR funding and community empowerment. Journal of Development Studies , 59 (2), 234–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2022.2098765
Nguyen, T. T., et al. (2018). Stakeholder engagement in mining. Resources Policy , 56 , 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.02.010
Putera, A., et al. (2020). Generational impacts of CSR. Journal of Rural Studies , 78 , 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.003
Rahaju, A., et al. (2025). Ethical research practices in vulnerable communities. Ethics and International Affairs , 39 (1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1017/S089267942400056X
Rosyada, N., et al. (2024). Participatory governance in CSR. Journal of Community Engagement , 12 (1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/19438621241234567
Saputra, A., & Hanutama, B. (2025). Community perceptions of CSR. Journal of Sustainable Development , 18 (2), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v18n2p78
Schmidt, J., et al. (2018). Gaps in CSR research. Journal of Business Ethics , 153 (2), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3346-0
Shelia, S., et al. (2024). CSR and community resilience. Sustainability , 16 (5), 1234. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051234
Tilt, C. (2016). Contextual CSR: A new framework. Business Ethics Quarterly , 26 (2), 145–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2015.56
Tsheole, N., et al. (2023). Global best practices in CSR. Journal of International Business Studies , 54 (3), 345–362. https://doi.org/10.1057/s10551-022-00012-3
Viveros, J. (2014). Community participation in CSR. Journal of Business Ethics , 124 (2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1890-1
Wu, H., & Jin, Q. (2022). ISO 26000 and CSR in mining. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management , 29 (4), 1234–1250. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2200
Zhao, Y., et al. (2022). Global CSR frameworks. Journal of Cleaner Production , 345 , 127567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.127567
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Teguh Iman Santoso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. S International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Automotive Experiences is published under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the restrictive license (non-commercial) as follows:
License
License to Publish
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0). The author hereby grants International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review an exclusive publishing and distribution license in the manuscript include tables, illustrations or other material submitted for publication as part of the manuscript (the “Articleâ€) in print, electronic and all other media (whether now known or later developed), in any form, in all languages, throughout the world, for the full term of copyright, and the right to license others to do the same, effective when the article is accepted for publication. This license includes the right to enforce the rights granted hereunder against third parties.
Author's Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author/s, has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
User Rights
Under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, the author(s) and users are free to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material). Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
Rights of Authors
Authors retain the following rights:
- Copyright, and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
- The right to use the substance of the article in future own works, including lectures and books,
- The right to reproduce the article for own purposes, provided the copies are not offered for sale, and
- The right to self-archive the article.
Co-Authorship
If the article was prepared jointly with other authors, the signatory of this form warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to sign this agreement on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this agreement.
Royalties
This agreement entitles the author to no royalties or other fees. To such extent as legally permissible, the author waives his or her right to collect royalties relative to the article in respect of any use of the article by International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Reviews or its sublicensee.
Miscellaneous
International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review will publish the article (or have it published) in the Journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed and International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review or its sublicensee has become obligated to have the article published. International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review may conform the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, and usage that it deems appropriate.

