Determinant on The Structural Performance of Krisnadwipayana University

Authors

  • Lina Tio Linclon University
  • Dorris Yadewani University of West Sumatra
  • Ali Ameen Lincoln University College
  • Ibrahin Alrajawy Lincoln University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibmr.v3i2.809

Keywords:

Technopreneurship Innovation, , Process Innovation,, Administrative Innovation, , Student Performance Structure

Abstract

The rise of knowledge-based technopreneurship has led to significant changes in work and the demands placed on organizations. Organizations are required to become a repository of innovation and nurture and retain talent resources. The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the impact that technological entrepreneurship, process innovation, and administrative innovation have had on the structural performance of Krisnadwipayana University. Students who made use of various smart government services were selected through a process known as random sampling. A total of 700 respondents were asked to participate in the survey, but only 403 did so, yielding a response rate of 57.57%. After removing missing data, outliers, and questionable replies, 372 respondents were evaluated. SmartPLS 3.0 was used to analyze research models using PLS and SEM-VB. The findings of this study add to what is known about technopreneurship in the academic and public sectors. They look at how innovations in technology, processes, and management affect the academic and administrative success of Krisnadwipayana University students.

References

Al-Amri, AY, Hassan, R., Isaac, O., & Masoud, Y. (2018). The effect of transformational leadership on organizational innovation in higher education: the case of developing countries. International Journal of Management and Human Science (IJMHS), 2(4), 25-37.

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

Awang, Z. (2015). SEM MADE SIMPLE: A Gentle to Learn Structural Equation Modelling. MPWS Rich Publications.

Certo, SC & STC (2009). Modern Management: Concept and Skills. (PI Edition (ed.); Eleventh E).

Fidell, L. S., & Tabachnick, B. G. (2003). Preparatory data analysis. (Vol. 2). John & Wily Sons, inc.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. CA : Sage Publications.

Hair, J.F., et al. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE.

Hair, Joseph F., et al. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective. (7th ed.). Pearson Education.

Harjono, Ardi Widyatmoko, and Nurhidayat, T. (2013). Politama Entrepreneurship Learning. Proceedings of KNIT RAMP-IPB, 27–32.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015). "A New Criterion for Assessing Discriminant Validity in Variance-based Structural Equation Modeling",. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 4(1), 115–135.

Hussain, R., Al Nasser, A., & Hussain, Y. K. (2015). Service quality and customer satisfaction of a UAE-based airline: An empirical investigation. Journal of Air Transport Management, 42, 167-175.

Isaac, O., Masoud, Y., Samad, S., & Abdullah, Z. (2016). The mediating effect of strategic implementation between strategy formulation and organizational performance within government institutions in Yemen. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 11(10), 1002-1013.

J.B., B. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31–46.

Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling ((2nd ed.).). The Guilford Press.

Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D. (1970). Determining sample sizes for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Mintardjo, C. (2008). Technopreneurs as 21st Century Entrepreneurs: An Introduction. FORMAS Journal, 1(4), 228–237.

Musa, H., Azmi, FR, Mohamad, N., Shahbodin, F., & Fam, S. (2017). Creative industry learning and development towards craft products: Critical success factors of technopreneurship. Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day, 246-247.

Nasution., AH (2007). Industrial Management. Andi Offset.

Özbilgin, MF (Ed. ). (2010). Handbook of research on high-technology entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Prodan, I. (2007). A model of technological entrepreneurship. Handbook of research on techno-entrepreneurship, 26-38. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

Hair, J.F., Black, B., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2007). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.

Saunders Mark N, K. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students. In Synthese (8th ed., pp. 1–867). Pearson. www.pearson.com/uk

Schermerhorn, Jr, John R, James G. Hunt, RNO (2006). Organizational Behavior Essentials. (Ninth Edit). John Wiley & Sons,

Now, Umar; Bougie, R. (2013). Research Methods for Business. Willey.

Shahiri, A. M., & Husain, W. (2015). A review on predicting student's performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 414–442.

Sutarno. (2012). Miscellaneous Business Management. Science house.

Tsai, W. (2000). Social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intra-organizational linkages. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.

Wang, C.L., & Ahmed, P.K. (2004). The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 303–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060410565056

Downloads

Published

2023-12-29

How to Cite

Tio, L., Yadewani, D. ., Ameen, A. ., & Alrajawy, I. . (2023). Determinant on The Structural Performance of Krisnadwipayana University. International Journal of Islamic Business and Management Review, 3(2), 183–192. https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibmr.v3i2.809

Issue

Section

Articles