Quality of Work Life and Work Motivation on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as Moderating Variable

Authors

  • Fitria Fitria Universitas Bina Insan
  • surajiyo surajiyo universitas Bina Insan
  • Ronal Aprianto universitas Bina Insan
  • Irma Idayati universitas Bina Insan
  • Hardi Mulyono universitas Bina Insan
  • Rindi Ningmas universitas Bina Insan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54099/aijms.v1i1.307

Keywords:

Quality of Work Life, Work Motivation, Employee Performance, Job Satisfaction.

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of Quality of Work Life and Work Motivation on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as a Moderating Variable at the Agriculture Office of Lubuklinggau City. The research method used in this study is a quantitative method. Quantitative methods can be defined as research methods based on the philosophy of positivism, used to examine certain populations or samples, collecting data using research instruments, analyzing quantitative/statistical data with the aim of testing predetermined hypotheses. Data collection techniques were carried out by means of observation, interviews and documentation. The results of the study indicate that there is an indirect effect of work motivation on employee performance through job satisfaction as a moderating variable at the Lubuklinggau City Agriculture Service, this is based on the results of the indirect effect value for the influence of work motivation on performance through job satisfaction as a moderating variable of 0.143 with a t-value the statistic of 2254 is greater than the t-table value of 1.96. significance value of 0.025. Furthermore, there is an indirect effect on the quality of work life on performance through job satisfaction as a moderating variable at the Lubuklinggau City Agriculture Service, this is based on the results of the indirect effect value for the influence of the quality of work life on performance through job satisfaction as a moderating variable of 0.274 with a t-statistic value of 4.167 is greater than the t-table value of 1.96. significance value of 0.000. It can be concluded that the quality of work life and work motivation affect employee performance with job satisfaction as a moderating variable at the Lubuklinggau City Agriculture Office. and there is an indirect effect of the variables of Quality of Work Life and Work Motivation have an effect on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as a Moderating Variable in the Agriculture Service of Lubuklinggau City.

References

Bina Insan University, ed. 2021 Guidelines for Writing Proposals and Thesis. Lubuklinggau

Afandi, P. (2916). Concept & indicators of Human Resource Management. CV Budi Utama.

Andriwardhya, N. L. R. (2021). The Effect of Quality of Work Life on Job Satisfaction Through Organizational Commitment as a Mediation Variable at Bank Mandiri Kediri City. Vol. 01.

Farmi, N. (2020). Effect of Quality Of Work Life on Employee Performance PT.POS INDONESIA KPRK LHOKSEUMAWE With Intrinsic Motivation and Job Satisfaction as Intervening Variables. Vol.5.

Ichsan, R. N. (2020). The Effect of Work Discipline on the Performance of Civil Servants (PNS) in the Adjutant General of the Military Region (Ajendam)-1 Bukit Barisan Medan. Vol.28.

Jaya, U. (2018). The Influence of Organizational Culture and Work Environment Motivation on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as a Moderating Variable at the Tourism and Creative Economy Office of Riau Province. Vol.X.

Jogiyanto, Willy A. &. (2015). Partial Least Square (pls). C.V ANDI OFFSET.

Kaswan. (2017). Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Alphabet CV.

Mas, A. H. and N. (2016). Quality Of Work Life and Organizational Citizenship Behavior An Empirical Study.

Mawu, K. S. (2018). Effect of Quality of Work Life and Job Satisfaction on Work Productivity of Regional Secretariat Office Employees of Southeast Minahasa Regency. Vol.6.

Prof. Dr. H. Siswoyo Haryono, MM, Mp. (2017). SEM method. Publisher : Luxima Metro Media.

Qila, A. (2018). Summary of HR Management Theory.

Rahman, A. (2017). Quality of Work Life A Literature Review and Views in Islamic Concepts. Vol.6.

Sopiah, E. M. S. (2018). Strategic Resource Management. CV : ANDI OFFSET. Sugiyono. (2018). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabet

Sujarweni, W. (2019). Research Methodology. New Press Library.

Surajiyo. (2021). The Effect of Motivation on Employee Performance with Work Discipline as a Moderating Variable at the Musi Rawas Transportation Service. Vol.2

Tilaar, N. R. (2017). The Effect of Quality of Work Life, Work Discipline and Compensation on Employee Work Productivity at the Office of the Environment Agency of North Sulawesi Province. Vol.5.

Wibowo, E. (2016). The Effect of Occupational Safety and Health on Performance With Job Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable. Vol.9.

Yusuf Baiquni Ahmad, Murgianto & T. A. (2017). The Influence of Organizational Culture, Quality of Work LIfe and Work Motivation on Operational Employee Performance at XYZ Sidoarjo With Trust as a Moderating Variable.Competence. Society of Interdisciplinary Business Research, 4, 16.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-20

How to Cite

Fitria, F., surajiyo, surajiyo, Ronal Aprianto, Irma Idayati, Hardi Mulyono, & Rindi Ningmas. (2022). Quality of Work Life and Work Motivation on Employee Performance with Job Satisfaction as Moderating Variable . Adpebi International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences, 1(1), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.54099/aijms.v1i1.307

Issue

Section

Articles