Risk Management and Sustainability Performance Research Map: A comprehensive Bibliometric analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibr.v4i1.1195Keywords:
Risk Management, , Sustainability performance, , Biblioshiny, , Cluster, , MappingAbstract
Purpose – This study aims to investigate research trends and patterns in the field of risk management and sustainability performance using bibliometric analysis methods.
Methodology/approach – By utilizing the Scopus database from 2000
- 2024, we collect data from relevant articles and conduct analysis of keywords, authors, journals, and institutional affiliates. To address this issue, our critical review examined 677 articles discussing research on risk management and sustainability. The analysis tools used for bibliometric analysis are Biblioshiny and Vos Viewer.
Findings – The results of the analysis show that there are eight main clusters covering various related aspects, such as corporate sustainability, supply chain management, environmental management, disaster risk management, credit risk management and green economy, business competition, decision management, and sustainable entrepreneurship. Each cluster is analyzed in depth to identify the contribution and relationship between the variables involved.
Novelty/value – These findings provide a comprehensive understanding of the current research landscape and point to potential directions for future research in the field of risk management and sustainability. This research also emphasizes the importance of a cross- disciplinary approach in addressing global sustainability challenges
References
Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2007). Innovation and entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, X., Chen, J., Wu, D., Xie, Y., & Li, J. (2016). Mapping the research trends by co-word analysis based on keywords from funded project. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 547–555.
Corsini, F., Certomà, C., Dyer, M., & Frey, M. (2019). Participatory energy: Research, imaginaries and practices on people’contribute to energy systems in the smart city. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 142, 322–332.
Galaz, V., Gars, J., Moberg, F., Nykvist, B., & Repinski, C. (2015). Why ecologists should care about financial markets. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30(10), 571–580.
Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Botella-Carrubi, M. D., & Gonzalez-Cruz, T. F. (2018). Social capital, human capital, and sustainability: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainability, 10(12), 4751.
González-Torres, T., Rodríguez-Sánchez, J.-L., Pelechano-Barahona, E., & García-Muiña, F. E. (2020). A systematic review of research on sustainability in mergers and acquisitions. Sustainability, 12(2), 513.
Grandjean, P., Eriksen, M. L., Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2011). The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: a bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles. Environmental Health, 10, 1–8.
Herrera-Franco, G., Montalván-Burbano, N., Carrión-Mero, P., Apolo-Masache, B., & Jaya-Montalvo, M. (2020). Research trends in geotourism: A bibliometric analysis using the scopus database. Geosciences, 10(10), 379.
Huang, D. Z. X. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) activity and firm performance: a review and consolidation. Accounting and Finance, 61(1), 335–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12569
Jalal, S. K. (2019). Co-authorship and co-occurrences analysis using Bibliometrix R-package: A casestudy of India and Bangladesh. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS), 66(2), 57–64.
Jurisch, M. C., Rosenberg, Z., & Krcmar, H. (2016). Emergent risks in business process change projects. Business Process Management Journal, 22(4), 791–811.
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Maier, D., Maier, A., Așchilean, I., Anastasiu, L., & Gavriș, O. (2020). The relationship between innovation and sustainability: A bibliometric review of the literature. Sustainability, 12(10), 4083.
Manab, N. A., & Aziz, N. A. A. (2019). Integrating knowledge management in sustainability risk management practices for company survival. Management Science Letters, 9(4), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.1.004
Martinez, M. G., Zouaghi, F., Marco, T. G., & Robinson, C. (2019). What drives business failure? Exploring the role of internal and external knowledge capabilities during the global financial crisis. Journal of Business Research, 98, 441–449.
Muñoz, P., Janssen, F., Nicolopoulou, K., & Hockerts, K. (2018). Advancing sustainable entrepreneurship through substantive research. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24(2), 322–332.
Nobanee, H., Hamadi, F. Y. Al, Abdulaziz, F. A., Abukarsh, L. S., Alqahtani, A. F., Alsubaey, S. K., Alqahtani, S. M., & Almansoori, H. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of sustainability and risk management. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 13, Issue 6). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063277
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 231–250.
Pizzi, S., Caputo, A., Corvino, A., & Venturelli, A. (2020). Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): A bibliometric investigation and systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124033
Powers, M. R. (2006). Pure vs speculative risk: False choice; sham marriage. The Journal of Risk Finance, 7(4), 345–347.
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 681–695.
Sadollah, A., Nasir, M., & Geem, Z. W. (2020). Sustainability and optimization: From conceptual fundamentals to applications. Sustainability, 12(5), 2027.
Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
Tang, M., Liao, H., Wan, Z., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Rosen, M. A. (2018). Ten years of sustainability (2009 to 2018): A bibliometric overview. Sustainability, 10(5), 1655.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice (pp. 285–320). Springer.
Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
Zhang, Y., Huang, K., Yu, Y., & Yang, B. (2017). Mapping of water footprint research: A bibliometric analysis during 2006–2015. Journal of Cleaner Production, 149, 70–79.
Zhu, J., & Hua, W. (2017). Visualizing the knowledge domain of sustainable development research between 1987 and 2015: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 110(2), 893–914.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472.
Citations and references must strictly follow APA 7 (American Psychological Association) style with DOI NUMBER. References should relate only to the content that is cited within the text of the manuscript. Consulting the APA style manual (http://www.apastyle.org/pubmanual.html) is highly recommended for compiling manuscript submissions.
Bahari, N., Yunus, A. R., Jabar, J. A., & Yusof, S. W. M. (2018). Entrepreneur Characteristics and Firm Performance: A Study on Malaysian Food Manufacturing Industry Sme’s. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 23(2), PP 92-98. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2302079298
Iskamto, D. (2022). Stress and Its Impact on Employee Performance. International Journal of Social and Management Studies, 2, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.5555/ijosmas.v2i3.42
Laguna, M., Wiechetek, M., & Talik, W. (2012). Competencies of Managers and Their Business Success. Central European Business Review, 1(3), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.25
Riewe, M., & Université de Liège > Master ingé. gest., À. F. (2020). Development of an incentive system and steering tool in the operating room management. https://matheo.uliege.be/handle/2268.2/8680
Sajilan, S., & Tehseen, S. (2015). Cultural Orientations, Entrepreneurial Competencies and SMEs Business Success: The Contingent Roles of Environmental Turbulence and Network Competence. Society of Interdisciplinary Business Research, 4, 16.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Indonesian Business Review
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
