Strategic Prioritization of IT Projects to Enhance Banking Operations Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibr.v4i2.1523Keywords:
IT project prioritization, , AHP, , banking operations, , strategic alignment,Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to develop a strategy for prioritizing information technology (IT) development projects that align with the operational objectives and resource limitations of Bank BRI.
Methodology/approach – The research adopts a mixed-methods approach. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to determine the priority weight of each IT project based on five key criteria: customer acquisition, service quality, regulatory compliance, product innovation, and operational efficiency. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) are conducted with key stakeholders to validate findings and identify implementation barriers. Root cause analysis using Why-Why and Fishbone Diagrams is performed to uncover underlying issues in project delays and prioritization gaps.
Findings – It was found that projects contributing to increased transactions and customer base receive the highest priority. However, FGD findings reveal that implementation often diverges from analytical priority due to resource constraints, unclear scope, and lack of filtering mechanisms. A set of strategies is proposed to improve project filtering, resource allocation, and inter-unit coordination.
Novelty/value – This research introduces an integrated prioritization framework combining AHP with stakeholder validation and root cause analysis, offering a practical approach to IT project governance in banking institutions. The model enhances decision-making beyond weight-based ranking by incorporating real-world constraints and institutional readiness.
References
Abu Sarhan, M., Bien, A., & Barczentewicz, S. (2024). Use of analytical hierarchy process for selecting and prioritizing islanding detection methods in power grids. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 14(3), 2422–2435. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v14i3.pp2422-2435
Agápito, A. de O., Vianna, M. de F. D., Moratori, P. B., Vianna, D. S., Meza, E. B. M., & Matias, I. de O. (2019). Using multicriteria analysis and fuzzy logic for project portfolio management. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 347–357. https://doi.org/10.14488/BJOPM.2019.v16.n2.a14
Agustinus, A., Sutrisno, S., & Harjanto, S. (2022). Business performance improvement in rubber-parts factory through a quality management model. Sosiohumaniora, 24(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i2.39989
Agustinus, A., Sutrisno, S., & Harjanto, S. (2022). Effect of talent management and knowledge management on company reputation with employee performance as an intervening variable: Case study of employees at PT Taspen (Persero). Sosiohumaniora, 24(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v24i2.39989
Agustinus, A., Sutrisno, S., & Harjanto, S. (2022). Implementing health safety environment (HSE) process management to improve HSE performance, competitive advantage and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Engineering & Management Research, 3(2), 130–138.
Alharbi, A., Alosaimi, W., Alyami, H., Alouffi, B., Almulihi, A., Nadeem, M., Sayeed, M. A., & Khan, R. A. (2024). Selection of Data Analytic Techniques by Using Fuzzy AHP TOPSIS from a Healthcare Perspective. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 144, 104407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104407
Amelia, T., & Mohamed, R. (2023). A decision tree approach based on BOCR for minimizing criteria in requirements prioritization. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 32(2), 1094–1104. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v32.i2.pp1094-1104
Ansaripour, H., Haeussler, K. L., Ferguson, S. J., & Flohr, M. (2023). Prioritizing biomaterials for spinal disc implants by a fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS decision making method. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-48735-9
Ayhan, D., Mendoza, F. A., Gul, M. R., Ari, I., Alpas, H., & Oztop, M. H. (2024). Social life cycle sustainability assessment of dried tomato products based on material and process selection through multi‐criteria decision making. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.13974
Boca, G. D. (2011). Green management quality. North University Baia Mare.
Cahyadinata, I. (2020). Descriptive, Correlation Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process of Coastal Community Empowerment of Bengkulu City, Indonesia. 10(3).
Estrada-Esponda, R. D., López-Benítez, M., Matturro, G., & Osorio-Gómez, J. C. (2024). Selection of software agile practices using Analytic hierarchy process. Heliyon, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22948
Forman, E. H., & Gass, S. I. (2001). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. Operations Research, 49(4), 469-486
Harisudin, M., Adi, R. K., & Qonita, R. A. (2023). Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Determining the Development Strategy of Tempeh Processed Product. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 20(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.29244/jma.20.1.55-65
Hazza, M. H. al, Abdelwahed, A., Ali, M. Y., & Sidek, A. B. A. (2022). An Integrated Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection using the Delphi Method and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP): A New Framework. International Journal of Technology, 13(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.14716/ijtech.v13i1.4700
Heizer, J., & Render, B. (2017). Operations Management. Pearson.
Hunger, J. D., & Wheelen, T. L. (2011). Strategic Management and Business Policy: Toward Global Sustainability (13th ed.). Pearson.
Hussain, S., Chen, J. H., & Hussain, T. (2024). Decision-Making Framework for Improving Bank Performance in Emerging Markets: The Analysis of AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-GRA Models. Journal of Banking and Finance, 150, 106873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106873
Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jusoh, R. M., Amirah, F., Shukri, A., Aishah, S., Ali, S., & Ali, F. (2023). A Simulation-based Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Method for Fund Allocation Assessment. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 135, 102713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2023.102713
Karlsen, J. T., Andersen, J., Birkely, L. S., & Ødegård, E. (2006). An empirical study of critical success factors in IT projects. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 3(4), 297–311.
Krenicky, T., Hrebenyk, L., & Chernobrovchenko, V. (2022). Application of Concepts of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Decision-Making. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(4), 304–310. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0039
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2019). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm. Pearson.
Lin, G., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Shen, C., Xu, H., & Wang, S. (2024). Performance assessment of public transport networks: An AHP-ANP approach. Heliyon, 10(22). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40309
Lock, D. (2020). Project Management. Routledge. Diunduh dari: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Project_Management.html?id=pFsPEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Lukiman, A. D., & Richard, R. (2020). Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), and Reorder Point (ROP) in Inventory Management System. ComTech: Computer, Mathematics and Engineering Applications, 11(1), 29–34. https://doi.org/10.21512/comtech.v11i1.5746
Mujtaba, M. A., Munir, A., Imran, S., Nasir, M. K., Muhayyuddin, M. G., Javed, A., Mehmood, A., Habila, M. A., Fayaz, H., & Qazi, A. (2024). Evaluating Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management Scenarios: A Multicriteria Decision Making Approach. Heliyon, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25788
Nguyen, N. B. T., Lin, G. H., & Dang, T. T. (2021). Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach For Online Food Delivery (OFD) Companies Evaluation And Selection: A Case Study in Vietnam. Processes, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9081274
Pant, S., Kumar, A., Ram, M., Klochkov, Y., & Sharma, H. K. (2022). Consistency Indices in Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Review. In Mathematics (Vol. 10, Issue 8). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081206
Pembuain, A., Priyanto, S., & Suparma, L. B. (2019). The Weighting of Risk Factors for Road Infrastructure Accidents Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Method. 9(4).
Plekhanov, D., Franke, H., & Netland, T. H. (2023). Digital transformation: A review and research agenda. European Management Journal, 41(6), 821–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.007
Prasetyaningrum, I., Fathoni, K., & Priyantoro, T. T. J. (2020). Application of Recommendation System With AHP Method And Sentiment Analysis. Telkomnika (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control), 18(3), 1343–1353. https://doi.org/10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v18i3.14778
Priyanto, S., Parikesit, D., & Zudhy Irawan, M. (2020). Identification and Analysis on Stakeholder of Cross-Border Freight Transportation. 10(4).
Project Management Institute. (2021). A Guide To The Project Management Body Of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (7th ed.). Project Management Institute.
Raju, S. K., Natesan, S., Alharbi, A. H., Kannan, S., Khafaga, D. S., Periyasamy, M., Eid, M. M., & El-Kenawy, E. S. M. (2024). AHP VIKOR Framework For Selecting Wind Turbine Materials With A Focus On Corrosion And Efficiency. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 24071. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-72761-w
Restrepo-Morales JA, Echavarria J, Durango-Yepes C. (2024). Strategic Decision-Making In Project Management: Applying FAHP to Select Research Agendas. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development. 8(9): 4627. https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i9.4627
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012). Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Second Edition. New York: Springer
Sari, D. P., Wicaksono, P. A., Handayani, N. U., & Siahaan, Y. E. (2020). Integrating AHP, Cluster Analysis, and Fuzzy TOPSIS to Evaluate Emergency Warehouse Locations of Mount Merapi Eruption Victims. 10(5).
Saurina, N., Siswoyo, S., & Retnawati, L. (2023). Application of Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process for Choosing The Best Project Cost Estimation in the Gresik District. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 10(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2023.01.021
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wang, C. N., Nguyen, N. A. T., Dang, T. T., & Lu, C. M. (2021). A Compromised Decision-Making Approach to Third-party Logistics Selection in Sustainable Supply Chain Using Fuzzy AHP And Fuzzy VIKOR Methods. Mathematics, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9080886
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Saribatiara Saribatiara, Agustinus Hariadi Djoko Purwanto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.