The Influence of Investigative Audit Procedure Accuracy and Professional Skepticism on Digital Fraud

Authors

  • whida sukma Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta
  • Ety Meikhati Duta Bangsa University
  • Umi Hanifah Duta Bangsa University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibr.v5i2.1901

Keywords:

Investigative Audit Procedures, Professional Skepticism,bility, Digital Fraud, Auditor Capability

Abstract

This study aims to examine the effect of the appropriateness of investigative audit procedures and professional skepticism on auditors' ability to detect digital fraud. A quantitative approach was employed using primary data collected from 80 auditors working at Public Accounting Firms (KAPs) in the Surakarta and Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), Indonesia. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression with SPSS version 27. The findings reveal that the appropriateness of investigative audit procedures and professional skepticism both have a positive and significant effect on auditors' ability to detect digital fraud. These results suggest that implementing investigative audit procedures tailored to digital forensic practices, together with maintaining a high level of professional skepticism, plays a crucial role in enhancing auditors' capability to identify increasingly sophisticated digital financial fraud. Therefore, Public Accounting Firm (KAP) need to improve auditor competency in implementing investigative audit procedures that are appropriate to the characteristics of digital fraud and strengthen the application of professional skepticism through continuous training and development.

References

Affandi, A. M. J. (2024). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi dan Skeptisme Profesional terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Politala, 7(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.34128/jra.v7i1.234

Febriana, N., Elisabet, S. H., Cecilia, P. H., Trimanda, G. J., Putri, A., Nejevrina, P. R. J., & Riri, H. (2024). Analysis of the Objectives and Responsibilities of Auditors in Detecting Fraud in Financial Statements. Jiic: Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(8), 3047–7824. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jiic/article/view/1049?utm

Gaol, E. L., Sihombing, M. T., Hafni, N. Y., & Handriyani, D. (2025). The Function of Forensic Audit, Attitude of Auditor, Effectiveness of Auditor Procedures, Auditor’s Experience and Auditor’s Ability to Identify Fraud in a Company. 1(Januari), 101–108.

Handayani, N., Hindana, N. A., Khasanah, U., & Utama, F. R. (2026). Tinjauan Etika Profesi dan Independensi Auditor dalam Mempertahankan Kualitas Audit di Era Digital. 1(4), 1741–1749. https://indojurnal.com/index.php/edu/article/view/3257

Komariyah, F. N., & Haryati, T. (2026). Analisis Prosedur Audit atas Kas dan Setara Kas dalam Mendeteksi Risiko Fraud di Era Digital. 4(1). https://jurnal.mediaakademik.com/index.php/jma/article/view/4681

Larasati, D. (2022). Determinan Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan. 1(8), 7–11. https://doi.org/10.36418/locus.v1i8.286

Meikhati, E., & Oktaviani, I. (2026). Penguatan Budaya Anti-Fraud Berbasis Gotong Royong Pada UB Cipta Mandiri Karanganyar. 5(1), 105–112. https://journal.adpebi.com/index.php/JPMA/article/download/1727/1320

Muazah, A. T., Sumarni, A., & Rahmatika, D. N. (2024). Pentingnya Audit Internal dan Implementasi Teknologi untuk Mencegah Fraud di Era Transformasi Digital. 2(3). https://journal.insyaka.ac.id/index.php/MUQADDIMAH/article/view/933

Prasetya, A., Afrisal, & Putra, W. E. (2023). Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Intervening Hubungan Kompetensi Auditor, Tekanan Waktu dan Keahlian Forensik terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan. 0832(September), 249–272. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jat.v10i2.16913

Pratiwi, D. E., & Rohman, A. (2021). Pengaruh Independensi, Skeptisisme Profesional, Pengalaman Audit, Kualitas Audit, Audit Tenure dan Prosedur Audit terhadap Tanggungjawab Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan pada Laporan Keuangan (Studi Empiris pada Auditor Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Se. 10, 1–15. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/accounting/article/view/31018

Prayitno, A., Sinosi, S. M., Amiruddin, & Syamsuddin. (2024). Peran Pengendalian Internal Berbasis Teknologi dalam Mendukung Akuntansi Forensik untuk Mendeteksi Fraud Di Era Digital. 5(2), 600–608. https://ojs.stieamkop.ac.id/index.php/ecotal/article/view/1881

Putri, S. Y., & Wilasittha, A. A. (2021). Perkembangan Fraud Theory dan Relevansi dalam Realita. 1(2), 726–735. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33005/senapan.v1i2.160

Ramadhan, M. S., & Mulyati. (2022). Can Forensic and Investigation Audit and Whistleblowing Detect Fraud During the COVID-19 Pandemic? 4(2), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol4.iss2.art5

Santoso, L. C., & Yanti, H. B. (2025). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Pengalaman dan Skeptisisme Prpfesional terhadap Deteksi Kecurangan Dimoderasi Sensitivitas Etis pada Auditor Forensik. 19(1), 602–620. https://jurnal.stiq-amuntai.ac.id/index.php/al-qalam/article/view/4368

Siahaan, I. F. M., & Suryaningrum, D. H. (2024). Prosedur Audit Investigasi dalam Mengungkap Tindakan Fraud di PT XYZ oleh KAP JAS. 4(2), 24–34. https://www.dhsjournal.id/index.php/SBAMER/article/view/223

Sinaga, R. M., Putri, A. M., & Fionasari, D. (2024). Pengaruh Skeptisme Profesional, Independensi dan Pengalaman Auditor terhadap Kemampuan Auditor dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan (Studi Kasus pada Kantor Akuntan Publik di Kota Pekanbaru). https://jurnaluniv45sby.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/1594/2071

Siwi, P. R., Hanifah, U., & Suhatmi, E. C. (2023). Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC), Dividend Policy, and Debt Policy as Accentuation of Firm Value in the Banking Financial Services Sector. 7(2), 113–128. https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/syirkah/article/download/22182/7113

Syahril, M. A. F., & Aris, A. (2024). Strategies and Dynamics of Online Fraud in Indonesia : Tracing the Effectiveness of the Implementation of the Electronic and Transaction Information Act. 2(3), 198–205. http://www.ejournal.um-sorong.ac.id/index.php/jlj/article/view/3711

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

sukma, whida, Meikhati, E., & Hanifah, U. (2026). The Influence of Investigative Audit Procedure Accuracy and Professional Skepticism on Digital Fraud. International Journal of Indonesian Business Review, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.54099/ijibr.v5i2.1901

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.